<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Patriot Tax and Bookkeeping,Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com</link>
	<description>(978) 604-4253</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Services in A Nutshell by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/our-services-in-a-nutshell/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=97#comment-105</guid>
		<description>yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Full Disclosure Part Deux: IRS to Require Millions of New 1099&#8242;s by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/full-disclosure-part-deux-irs-to-require-millions-of-1099s/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=326#comment-60</guid>
		<description>If your brother is in business the dealer would have to issue a 1099 under the proposal. The dealer most likely would make him fill out a W-9, which is a certification of the tax ID of the recipient of payments, since he could not confirm whether or not your brother was a sole proprietor. In your brother&#039;s case the tax ID would be his SSN. All sole proprietors have to disclose SSN&#039;s to customers on a routine basis, so this is not unusual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your brother is in business the dealer would have to issue a 1099 under the proposal. The dealer most likely would make him fill out a W-9, which is a certification of the tax ID of the recipient of payments, since he could not confirm whether or not your brother was a sole proprietor. In your brother&#8217;s case the tax ID would be his SSN. All sole proprietors have to disclose SSN&#8217;s to customers on a routine basis, so this is not unusual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Whose Side Are You On the IRS or the IRS Employee? Comment Below by Toni</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/whos-side-are-you-on-the-irs-or-the-irs-employee-comment-below/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=308#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Only an RO would say keeping receipts &quot;would be rediculous&quot;.  She is lucky she kept her job.  No one in exam could get by with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only an RO would say keeping receipts &#8220;would be rediculous&#8221;.  She is lucky she kept her job.  No one in exam could get by with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Full Disclosure Part Deux: IRS to Require Millions of New 1099&#8242;s by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/full-disclosure-part-deux-irs-to-require-millions-of-1099s/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=326#comment-53</guid>
		<description>This is just a proposal. The rules are not out yet. Individuals always put their SSN on W-9&#039;s when requested by customers or they don&#039;t get paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a proposal. The rules are not out yet. Individuals always put their SSN on W-9&#8242;s when requested by customers or they don&#8217;t get paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News If You Were Foreclosed or Agreed to A Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure (Short Sale) in 2009? by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/got-good-news-if-you-were-foreclosed-or-agreed-to-a-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure-short-sale-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=207#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Cali has reversed their position on this:

http://bit.ly/9gA4Vu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cali has reversed their position on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/9gA4Vu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9gA4Vu</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News If You Were Foreclosed or Agreed to A Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure (Short Sale) in 2009? by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/got-good-news-if-you-were-foreclosed-or-agreed-to-a-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure-short-sale-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=207#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are correct, so has CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are correct, so has CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is New York City the 51st State? They&#8217;re Sure Taxing Like They Are! by JAVSnyc</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/is-new-york-city-the-51st-state-theyre-sure-taxing-like-they-are/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>JAVSnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=235#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Someone emailed me:

&quot;Like John Lennon said &#039;They&#039;ll tax the pennies on your eyes.&#039; They don&#039;t care about obesity. They just want an excuse to tax something to line their own pockets.&quot;

I couldn&#039;t agree more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone emailed me:</p>
<p>&#8220;Like John Lennon said &#8216;They&#8217;ll tax the pennies on your eyes.&#8217; They don&#8217;t care about obesity. They just want an excuse to tax something to line their own pockets.&#8221;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is New York City the 51st State? They&#8217;re Sure Taxing Like They Are! by JAVSnyc</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/is-new-york-city-the-51st-state-theyre-sure-taxing-like-they-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>JAVSnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=235#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Concerning Governor Paterson’s proposed soda tax and the absurd justification behind it.  I dislike when my tax dollars are use in the name of bad science.  Soda has been around since 1265.  See... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drink#History

Governor Paterson should back off the soda.  It is not the source of the obesity problem.  Inferior physical and nutritional education, which of course leads to poor exercise habits and ill-advised diets, are the cause of inflated waistlines.  Having a salad with a Coke is far better then a bottle of water to wash down a face full of dirty water dogs.  Add walking up the stairs instead of taking the elevator and you’re golden.

There is bad science supporting this bad tax.  See… http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_articles/doctors_poke_holes_soda_tax_proposal

I advocate the responsible use of governmental powers, both in taxation and implementation of programs.  Why target soda with an extra tax?  Isn’t the sale tax we all pay on all the food we purchase enough of a burden?  Will a soda tax really do anything to curb obesity?

It offends me that some politician is planning to tax my freedom of choice in the name of a problem he will do nothing to solve.  The evaluation of Governor Paterson’s soda tax really comes down to one question.  How much of those soda tax dollars will fund physical exercise programs vs. pet projects to keep the politicians in office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning Governor Paterson’s proposed soda tax and the absurd justification behind it.  I dislike when my tax dollars are use in the name of bad science.  Soda has been around since 1265.  See&#8230; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drink#History" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_drink#History</a></p>
<p>Governor Paterson should back off the soda.  It is not the source of the obesity problem.  Inferior physical and nutritional education, which of course leads to poor exercise habits and ill-advised diets, are the cause of inflated waistlines.  Having a salad with a Coke is far better then a bottle of water to wash down a face full of dirty water dogs.  Add walking up the stairs instead of taking the elevator and you’re golden.</p>
<p>There is bad science supporting this bad tax.  See… <a href="http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_articles/doctors_poke_holes_soda_tax_proposal" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificblogging.com/news_articles/doctors_poke_holes_soda_tax_proposal</a></p>
<p>I advocate the responsible use of governmental powers, both in taxation and implementation of programs.  Why target soda with an extra tax?  Isn’t the sale tax we all pay on all the food we purchase enough of a burden?  Will a soda tax really do anything to curb obesity?</p>
<p>It offends me that some politician is planning to tax my freedom of choice in the name of a problem he will do nothing to solve.  The evaluation of Governor Paterson’s soda tax really comes down to one question.  How much of those soda tax dollars will fund physical exercise programs vs. pet projects to keep the politicians in office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News If You Were Foreclosed or Agreed to A Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure (Short Sale) in 2009? by admin</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/got-good-news-if-you-were-foreclosed-or-agreed-to-a-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure-short-sale-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=207#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Can you cite your source? Tax law principles dictate that the states accept the federal definitions of AGI as far as I know. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you cite your source? Tax law principles dictate that the states accept the federal definitions of AGI as far as I know. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good News If You Were Foreclosed or Agreed to A Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure (Short Sale) in 2009? by maddad</title>
		<link>http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/got-good-news-if-you-were-foreclosed-or-agreed-to-a-deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure-short-sale-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>maddad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patriottaxandbookkeeping.com/?p=207#comment-7</guid>
		<description>massachusetts de-coupled from the federal code on this one so the foregiven loan is taxable on your massachusetts return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>massachusetts de-coupled from the federal code on this one so the foregiven loan is taxable on your massachusetts return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

